Seleccionar página

Interconnection arrangements are used in a large number of financial transactions to determine the respective rights and remedies of two or more creditors in credit facilities made available to a joint borrower. Interconnection agreements are not standardized and their scope varies widely. Interconnection agreements may include provisions on the subsity of payments, terms of cessation of payment and other rights and remedies of creditors which do not involve guarantees. These payment subordinations are generally found, for example, in the case of unsecured mezzanine financing. However, in the case of secured financing transactions, the interconnection agreement may also regulate the rights and priorities relating to each creditor`s rights of pledge over the borrower`s assets, and this is where the Task Force has focused its efforts. When the second collateral market grew, the advisor to the first pawn lender devised various forms of substantially similar intercreditor agreements on the first pledge right/second pledge right. In the initial years of the second collateral market, the second collateral lender generally subordinated virtually all of its rights as a secured creditor to the rights of the first pledge creditor until the first pledge creditor was paid in full — the so-called “second silent”. Surprisingly, there were poorly published guidelines on the issues that consultants should consider when developing or revising an inter-credit agreement, and participants relied heavily on “market practices”. However, it gradually became apparent that the market had only limited experience of the effect of these provisions following a default by the borrower or the opening of bankruptcy proceedings. Until the financial crisis, the second largest deposit market had grown rapidly. According to the Loan Pricing Corporation, the dollar volume of second-loan loans increased from about $8 billion in 2003 to more than $29 billion in 2006.1 In the second quarter of 2007, second-deposit loans reached $15.21 billion, the highest quarter recorded for the issuance of second pledge rights2. 2 Like other forms of debt financing, financing declined sharply with the second right of pledge with the credit crisis of 2008. In the second quarter of 2009, the second edition of the guideline was less than $300 million.3 Please register or register to read this full article.

The American Bar Association`s Committee on Business Finance, ABA Section of Business Law, has just released the “Rapport of the Model First Lien/Second Lien Intercreditor Agreement Task Force”. This is the report of the Model First Lien/Second Lien (Task Force) Inter-Secretary Task Force, established by the Trade Finance Committee of the Business Settlement Section of the American Bar Association. This report first examines the reasons for the creation of the Task Force, its objectives and methodology. It will then present and consider any important provisions of the model agreement and examine its subject matter, perceived market practice and the prospects of the first and second secured creditors. Where appropriate, the report shall include other provisions and views. Although the second deposit transactions are structured in myriads. The second deposit structures have also migrated to the medium market and to patrimonial loans, where the second deposit systems have become commonplace. A typical structure is that a revolting lender holds a first right of pledge over all accounts, inventories and other short-term assets, while a lender holds a first right of pledge of equipment, real estate and other assets, with each lender also holding a second collateral right over the other`s primary collateral. Variations of these “Wrap” structures have become increasingly creative…